Today I asked Tribal Council member Tina Retasket the following question:

In October of 2007 you were paid for serving on the Election Board in violation of our election law, which said, the Election Board shall serve without pay. Why did you accept these payments when the law said Election Board members shall serve without pay?

She responded:

As you are aware, when we served on the Election Board we were staff members of the Tribe. As you may know, employment law requires that when you assign work to staff members, they must be compensated. We were doing the job we were assigned to do as part of our regular job assignments, and therefore were paid as staff members. As you know, the situation the past couple of years has been unique in that volunteers did not want to serve on the Election Board and the Council was tasked with finding a unique solution to the problem.

No employment law required Tina Retasket to sit on the Election Board. And since our election law clearly stated "Election Board members shall serve without pay", General Manager Brenda Bremner could not lawfully assign Election Board duties to Retasket as part of her job and Retasket could not lawfully accept payment for such duties.

Tina Retasket was a veteran Election Board member; she had served through previous elections. She had a solemn obligation to know our election law and to obey it. Retasket says this was a unique solution to a unique situation, but illegal payments to the Election Board through at least three elections can hardly qualify as "unique".

Keep in mind that Tina Retasket was paid an hourly wage about the same as the Governor of Oregon when she served on the Election Board in late 2007. The Tribal Council could have offered the same pay to any tribal volunteer. Instead they have arranged things so that only the hand-picked loyal staff of Brenda Bremner can be paid to serve on the Election Board. This assures an Election Board loyal to Brenda Bremner, and thus loyal to Chairman Pigsely herself.

Of course it is ridiculous that Retasket was even re-appointed to the Election Board in October 2007, since she had been removed from the Election Board in January 2007 when she was caught campaigning for Chariman Dee Pigsley and Vice-Chairman Bud Lane, during an election that Retasket was supposed to be administering fairly. But Retasket was spared any public announcement of her removal and she was spared any paper trail documenting her removal.

And later the same year she was quietly (and illegally) re-appointed and illegally paid over $40 an hour because political loyalty is what counts in the Pigsley/Bremner political machine, not ethical or even legal service.

I'm Lynette Warren and I'm running for Tribal Council....

...but you won't see my statement in your voters pamphlet because, for the first time in our history, a candidate's statement was rejected by the tribal government. You also won't see any details of my candidate's declaration in our quarterly Nesika Illahee, because, for the first time in it's history, the candidate's declarations made at the General Council Meeting were not reported. That is because Tribal Chairman Dee Pigsley, and her niece - General Manager Brenda Bremner, along with Bremner's hand-picked Election Board want to keep you from seeing what you're about to see in this letter. But it's important that you read it.

I've been encouraged and grateful for the support given to me throughout the past year. In May we led a successful drive to block a Constitutional amendment that would have further disempowered the membership. In the the last election I received 177 votes. That's an impressive showing from an out-of-area, first time candidate who was virtually unknown until last year. My friend, ally, and long time tribal activist, Lisa Brown, nearly won, but she fell short by a mere 29 votes. Let's elect Lisa Brown this year! Reggie Butler has spoken out against our failed business policies and against the conflicts-of-interest inherent in the fact that six of our Tribal Council members hold tribal jobs, five of them under Brenda Bremner. I also endorse Reggie Butler.

In this letter, I will explain in detail how our business ventures have become one disaster after another. In fact, the Siletz Tribal Business Corporation has lost millions of dollars of your money and has lost money every year it has existed. But Dee Pigsley's political machine will not allow this to be mentioned in any tribal publication.

I will also explain in detail how our election process has been corrupted. Did you know that before Tina Retasket became a Tribal Council member, she was removed from the Election Board in early 2007 when she was caught campaigning for Chairman Pigsley and Vice-Chairman Bud Lane in the middle of an election she was supposed to be administering fairly? You probably don't , because the details were never published and there was no written record of her removal. And Pigsley's political machine put Retasket back on the Election Board for the very next election! I will also document how Brenda Bremner arranged illegal payments to her hand-picked Election Board through our last three elections. And now that Election Board has rejected my candidate's statement for the voters pamphlet, because I explained all this in my statement.
Read the rest of this article »

Early on December 24th, I submitted my candidate statement to the Election Board for publication to the Voters Pamphlet. It was submitted on time, as per the Election Board's rules, but the Election Board refuses to print it. Instead they are publishing the words, "No statement available," after my name in the Voters Pamplet. The following is my statement, as submitted to the Election Board last week.

Lynette Warren Candidate Statement

Our tribal elections are being run by individuals who do not follow our laws. At the last General Council meeting Tracey Worman and Kurtis Barker introduced themselves as the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Election Board. In truth, they were not on the Election Board since their terms had expired. Barker said the Election Ordinance gave the General Manager the authority to to appoint them to the Election Board. The Election Ordinance does no such thing, in fact it requires that the Election Board be appointed by resolution of the Tribal Council. But Worman and Barker were appointed to the Election Board by General Manager Brenda Bremner in October 2007, in direct violation of that law. They either don't care enough about our law to know it, or they don't care about breaking it. In November they were again appointed illegally to the Election Board, this time by the Tribal Council which appointed them to the Election Board for a term ending in June 2009, directly violating the Election Ordinance which requires a term of 1 year.

The relationship between the Election Board and Brenda Bremner has been especially troubling. In October Tracey Worman told me several times that Brenda Bremner was overseeing the Election Board, and that they would go to her first with questions about their duties. This was utterly inappropriate since the General Manager has no legitimate legal role in our elections. But the Election Board has considered Bremner their boss, a fact Worman confirmed in at the General Council Meeting when she admitted they would consult Bremner first on matters of policy.

Just before the 2007 General Election, Tina Retasket was removed from the Election Board because she was caught campaigning for Tribal Chairman Dee Pigsley and Vice-Chairman Bud Lane. Chairman Pigsley whitewashed the incident by failing to disclose that the Election Board member removed was in fact then Assistant General Manager Retasket. Pigsley also failed to disclose that Retasket had been campaigning for Dee Pigsley and Bud Lane. Brenda Bremner told me that she asked Tina to resign and Tina did.

But since Retasket is a political ally of Chairman Pigsley, Vice-Chairman Lane, and General Manager Bremner, there was no paper trail – there is no written record of Retasket's removal from the Election Board, although the Election Board has the resignations of other members on file. This apparently does not seem irregular to Worman and Barker.

In October of 2007 the Tribal Council illegally ducked their responsibility to appoint the Election Board and passed a resolution to have Brenda Bremner appoint the Election Board. The reason given for authorizing this was that some of the Election Board members recently appointed by the Tribal Council had resigned, including Tracey Worman and Kurtis Barker. They resigned because they were not being paid for their Election Board duties. Bremner re-appointed Worman and Barker and initiated a policy of paying tribal staff members for their Election Board duties. This was in direct violation of our Election Ordinance at the time which required that Election Board members serve without pay. The ordinance was changed in September 2008 to allow staff members to be paid, but during our last three tribal elections Election Board members were paid in violation of our law.

Bremner also took the astonishing step of re-appointing Tina Retasket to the Election Board, even though she had asked for Retasket's resignation that same year when Retasket was caught campaigning for Pigsley and Lane. And it's worse than that – Brenda Bremner told me that she appointed Tina to serve only for the referendum election in December 2007, since Retasket planned to run for General Council. Our law forbids anyone from serving on the Election Board if they plan to run for office during the coming year. Worman has stated that Retasket worked only on the referendum election. Why would that be, if Retasket was appointed for a year like all the other Election Board members? Clearly because it was known Retasket would run. And Retasket did run and win, even though she sat on the Election Board for more than a month after the other candidates had declared.

We need to clean up our elections.

There is much more I need to address as a candidate but the Election Board has now imposed a word limit on what you can be allowed to hear in these statements. You can read the rest of what I have to say on Siletz.Net.

----

I sent the above statement at 12:53 AM, Dec 24. Election Board Chairman Tracey Worman confirmed that she received the statement at 8:12 AM the same day. Later that day, Election Board member Kurtis Barker sent out the following email. He didn't specify what he thought was a personal attack.

From: Kurtis Barker
Date: Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Lynette Warren 2009 Candidate Statement
To: Lynette Warren
Cc: Tracey Worman

Lynette,
Your Candidates Statement "as is" below will not be approved by the Election Board.
It violates the following rule: "Candidates Statements shall not include personal attacks on individuals."
This rule was approved by Tribal Council November 8th, 2008 with Resolution No. 2008-424.

You have three options:
1. Revise your statement and have it to the Election Board by 4pm today.
2. We can approve the last 2 paragraphs. The paragraph stating "We need to clean up our elections" and the paragraph that follows. (Let us know if you want this by 4pm today)
4. You could withdraw your whole candidates statement from the Voters Pamphlet.

If your statement is not re-submitted by 4pm today, it will not be included in the Voters Pamphlet.

As a friendly reminder- you have until 4pm today to submit a photo for the Voters Pamphlet and ballot, and you have until 4pm December 29th to withdraw your candidacy and not be included in the Voters Pamphlet.

If you have any questions, please let Tracey or I know.
Kurtis Barker
Election Board

Brenda Bremner Siletz Tribal General Manager Salary: $114,400

Ted Kulongoski Governor of Oregon Salary: $93,600

I recently requested and received documents regarding a grant application submitted by Mike Kennedy, our tribe's Natural Resources Manager. This information is available to all Americans under the Freedom of Information Act. One of these documents, dated August 6th 2008, reports our General Manager's salary this year as $114,400.

That's more than $20,000 higher than the annual salary of Ted Kulongoski, the Governor of Oregon. A list of state governor's salaries reports the Oregon governor's salary as $93,600.

Kulongoski governs a state with a population of 3,747,455 while Brenda Bremner manages a tribe with a population under 5,000. Oregon's state budget is well over 40 billion dollars. Obviously Governor Kulongoski's responsibilities far exceed those of General Manager Brenda Bremner, but she is paid over $20,000 more than the governor.

In fact, Brenda Bremner's salary is higher than that of 22 state governors: Alabama, Hawaii, New Mexico, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Kansas, Idaho, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Utah, Montana, Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, West Virgina, Oregon, North Dakota, Colorado, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Maine, all pay their governor less than the tribe pays our General Manager Brenda Bremner.

The same grant application lists our Assistant General Manager's salary in 2008 as $96,948. That appears to be the salary Tina Retasket was paid as Assistant General Manager earlier this year. That would mean that Tina Retasket was also making more than the Governor of Oregon when she was Brenda Bremner's assistant.

On Friday, November 14th 2008, the Election Board met with tribal attorney Craig Dorsay, so that Dorsay could explain the election ordinance to the board. Lisa Brown and I also attended the meeting. The meeting was recorded by Tracey Worman.

When they had finished reviewing the ordinance I asked Election Board chairman Tracey Worman a few questions. She told us that she had been on the Election Board in October 2007 and that she had worked with Tina Retasket then. I asked if Tina had worked on the General Election at that time, and Worman said Tina had been appointed only for the referendum. I asked how she knew that Tina had been appointed only for the referendum, and Worman said that was what General Manager Brenda Bremner had told Retasket, Worman, Cova St. Onge, and Kurtis Barker.

Election Board Chairman Tracey Worman said all of this in front of tribal attorney Craig Dorsay.

Worman said she had a memo detailing the terms of Tina Retasket's appointment to the Election Board. I asked to see it and she produced it for me, but tribal attorney Craig Dorsay intercepted it. After examining the document, Dorsay denied me access to it. He said if I wanted to see it I would have to request it from Tribal Council. He did not explain what authority he had over the Election Board or their documents. As far as I know he has no such authority.

The memo that Tracey Worman produced and described was also described for me by Brenda Bremner on November 6th when we were discussing Tina Retasket's appointment:

Lynette Warren: Why was she only appointed for the referendum?

Brenda Bremner: Because she had announced her candidacy for Council. So she could be on the General. She got elected last year. She couldn't be on the Election Board to deal with the general election.

Lynette Warren: So she didn't get a year long appointment?

Brenda Bremner: No, she got appointed only for the referendum.In my notes I specifically... in my note, in my memo I gave to them, she was notified and they were notified in Council that she would only be on there for the referendum.

Lynette Warren: So knowing that she was gonna be a candidate she was only appointed for the referendum?

Brenda Bremner: The deal was the referendum.

At the special Tribal Council on November 8th, however, Brenda Bremner denied that she knew that Tina Retasket planned to run for Tribal Council when Bremner appointed Retasket to the Election Board in October 2007. She denied this in front of the Tribal Council and tribal attorney Craig Dorsay.

Lest anyone be confused, we only have one Election Board which is charged with managing all tribal elections. By law, all Election Board appointments are for one year. By law, one cannot be appointed to the Election Board if one plans to run for tribal office during that one year term of service.

At the meeting on Friday with Craig Dorsay and the Election Board, I also got to see the Election Board's signed oaths of office for the past few years as well as resignation letters. Tina Retasket's oath of office was no different form that of other members. But while there were a number of resignations on file going back as far as 2006, there was no record of Tina Retasket's departure form the Election Board in early 2007.

On Thursday November 13th, Worman told me that she had no resignation from Retasket in ealrly 2007. She told me "That was between Brenda and Tina". Of course Brenda Bremner claims she does not oversee the Election Board so there is no legitimate reason why she would be involved in Retasket's resignation. The Election Board should have a written record of Retasket's resignation, as it has for other members, but in this case General Manager Brenda Bremner avoided leaving a paper trail which could have been damaging to Tina Retasket's political career.

Tina Retasket

Dee Pigsley

Bud Lane

Robert Kentta

Tina Retasket departed from the Election Board in early 2007 because of the ethical scandal associated with the campaign letter shown below. Read the rest of this article »

Tina Retasket and Brenda Bremner
As a consequence of my recent presentation at the General Council Meeting, there was a Special Tribal Council Meeting today to consider appointments to the Election Board. The Tribal Council voted to re-appoint Kurtis Barker and Tracey Worman to the Election Board, as well as Felicia Carmona.

I gave the following presentation to the Tribal Council, just before they voted:

---

I'm here today to address growing ethical problems with the Election Board. I intend to explain why our General Manager Brenda Bremner is ethically unfit to recommend appointments to the Election Board and why Kurtis Barker and Tracey Worman are unfit to serve.

In late 2007 Brenda Bremner and Tina Retasket conspired to break our elections laws, apparently with the tacit approval of the Tribal Council.

The Election ordinance states: “Election Board members shall each serve for one year from the date of appointment and may be removed only for cause.”

And it says that no person shall be appointed who “plans to be a candidate or who has an immediate family member or resident of the household who plans to be candidate in any election during his or her term of service.”

This was our law in 2007 and it remains our law today. The ordinance clearly states that no person shall be appointed who plans to be a candidate for tribal office in ANY election during their term, and it clearly defines that term as one year.

But Brenda Bremner appointed Tina Retasket to the Election Board in October 2007, and Tina accepted that appointment, even though both knew very well that Tina planned to run for Tribal Council just two months later.

I spoke with Brenda Bremner two days ago, on November 6th. She told me that Tina had only been appointed to the Election Board for the duration of the referendum election which was held on December 8th, 2007. Brenda told me that she gave Tribal Council a memo which explained that Tina would only serve on the Election Board through the referendum because Tina planned to run for Tribal Council.

Our Constitution says that Election Board members must serve set terms of office and our Election Ordinance defines that term as one year. There is nothing in our laws that authorizes Brenda to redefine that term of office.

So even though Brenda sought to create a term tailor-made to accommodate Tina's campaign for Tribal Council, Tina's term was legally one year, a year in which both Tina and Brenda knew perfectly well that Tina would run for Tribal Council.

Again, the Election Ordinance clearly states that no person shall be appointed who plans to be a candidate in ANY election during their term of office.

Brenda and Tina both knew the law. But they violated the law in order to get Tina on the Election Board and still accommodate Tina's campaign for Tribal Council. This is punishable by up to 6 months in prison or a fine of up to $5000, or both.

Tina was sitting on the Election Board at a time when it was already engaged in it's duties supervising the 2008 General Election - the very election in which Tina planned to run.

Our campaign for that election began on November 3rd, 2007, at the General Council Meeting. Robert Kentta, Lorraine Butler, Cynthia Farlow, Lisa Brown, Eva Clayton and I declared our candidacies that day. Tina Retasket did not declare her candidacy then because she was still on the Election Board. And Tina was still on the Election Board a month later - a full month into the campaign for Tribal Council. Obviously it is unethical for a candidate to sit on the Election Board during a campaign in which she intends to run. That's why we have laws against it. The result was that Tina won a seat on the Tribal Council, edging out Lisa Brown by only 29 votes. Of course, Lisa Brown did not have the advantage of sitting on the Election Board during the campaign.

The ethical problems with Brenda's appointment of Tina run much deeper. Earlier that same year Tina had departed from the Election Board due to an ethical scandal. When we spoke two days ago, Brenda told me that she, herself, had asked Tina for her resignation at that time, and that Tina had agreed. I asked why Brenda had called for Tina's resignation. Brenda said: “There was the appearance of a conflict because she wrote a letter and sent it out “

Brenda also said that the letter had endorsed certain candidates.

We know that those ”certain candidates”were in fact Tribal Chairman Dee Pigsley and Vice-Chairman Bud Lane.

Brenda told me Tina wrote and sent out the letter. This the same thing Chairman Dee Pigsley told the General Council in February 2007, although Dee failed to name Tina and she failed to disclose that Tina had been campaigning for Dee Pigsley and Bud Lane in the letter.

Brenda told me that she did not know if Tina had actually done anything unethical, but that Brenda had asked Tina to resign because of the appearance of unethical conduct.

I hardly know what to say about someone who claims not to know if it is unethical for an Election Board member to be campaigning for the Tribal Chairman and Vice-Chairman during an election she is supposed to be supervising fairly.

I can only say that such a demonstrated lack of an ethical compass should disqualify Brenda Bremner from any further involvement in our election process. Given all of this, the Tribal Council should never again consider her recommendations for Election Board appointments.

Today Brenda is recommending that Kurtis Barker and Tracy Worman be re-appointed. I will now present further reasons why these two individuals are unfit to serve.

I spoke with Tracey recently. I was astonished to hear her say that Brenda oversees the Election Board. She repeated this several times. She told me, for instance, that if the Election Board had an issue with a candidate's statement they would first contact the candidate to try to clear up any problems, then they would consult Brenda and then the Tribal Council if necessary. I asked another question about Election Board policy and Tracey told me she would have to ask Brenda, and that Brenda was away for a few days.

The problem here is that Brenda has no legitimate authority whatsoever over Election Board policies and decisions. It is an egregious violation of fair election practices for Brenda to be running our Election Board. I asked Jessie Davis about this and she told me “it would not be kosher” for Brenda to be overseeing the Election Board on such matters. Lillie Butler told me much the same thing.

But at the General Council meeting last week, right in front of the Tribal Council, Tracey confirmed that the Election Board would consult with Brenda first on matters of election policy. They don't see anything wrong with that.

On page 4 of the November issue of Siletz News there is an article by Kurtis Barker which states: "The Election Board now will be responsible for accepting and approving all candidate's statements. We have chosen to adopt many of the rules that govern statements in Siletz News. Statements will be limited to 450 words and not contain any personal attacks. One photo (optional) can be accepted with statements. Candidate's statements cannot be posted on Tribal property."

On the other hand, the Election Ordinance clearly says that the Election Board may propose rules regarding candidates statements, but the Tribal Council must review and approve such rules.

Tribal Council members Lillie Butler and Jessie Davis have both confirmed to me that the Tribal Council has not reviewed or approved the rules that Kurtis has attempted to impose on candidates. This article was of course published in our tribal newspaper by Brenda .

It is unlawful for the Election Board to impose rules that have not been reviewed and adopted by the Tribal Council. And it is utterly inappropriate for Brenda to be publishing such illegal pronouncements.

But it's hardly surprising that an Election Board which thinks it is supervised by Brenda is trying to impose the rules of the newspaper which Brenda runs, rules which she has used to reject or heavily censor my letters when I've criticized the Tribal Council.

Both Kurtis and Tracey confirmed to me that suppressing criticism of the Tribal Council was indeed a purpose of the new rules. Kurtis Barker put it most bluntly when he said: “We want articles that state why you want to be on Tribal Council, not like an attack mode where you candidates can blame the Tribal Council for what's going on. “

Brenda 's policy of political censorship of letters to the Siletz News is being extended into our election process with this power grab to control candidates' statements. Brenda is clearly orchestrating our newspaper and our Election Board in concert to muzzle political opponents of the Tribal Council. And Kurtis and Tracey have attempted to impose these rules unilaterally, without the approval of the Tribal Council, which our law requires.

For these reasons, Kurtis Barker and Tracey Worman are unfit to serve on the Election Board. Tribal Council should not re-appoint them.

If you do re-appoint these two to the Election Board, I want to be put on the agenda for the next Tribal Council meeting where I will present additional evidence of more violations of the election ordinance by Brenda Bremner, Tracey Worman, and Kurtis Barker. Also, expect to see me back in Siletz on election day explaining to the General Council why these two are unfit to serve on the Election Board and how Brenda Bremner is using them to corrupt our election process.

Lynette Warren
November 8th, 2008

---

note:

I spoke with Brenda Bremner two days ago, on November 6th. She told me that Tina had only been appointed to the Election Board for the duration of the referendum election which was held on December 8th, 2007. Brenda told me that she gave Tribal Council a memo which explained that Tina would only serve on the Election Board through the referendum because Tina planned to run for Tribal Council.

Even though Brenda told me this just two days ago on the phone, Brenda now denies knowing that Tina planned to be a candidate at the time of Tina's nomination to the Election Board in October 2007.

At this afternoon's Special Tribal Council Meeting, Tina also wouldn't admit that she planned to run for Tribal Council during the time she served on the Election Board for the pay raise referendum last year.

Here is what I said Saturday at the General Council Meeting in my candidate's declaration:

At the General Council Meeting in August of 2007 I tried to alert tribal members to grave problems associated with our Tribal Council's bailout of the bankrupt U.S Aeroteam. I also expressed grave doubts about the viability of Siletz Aeroteam.. I presented documents showing that, at a time when US Aeroteam was 100% owned by the tribe, US Aeroteam Chief Financial Officer John Busch submitted false and misleading information to the state of Ohio in order to qualify for a minority loan for over $1 million. The application stated that our tribe would remain 100% owners of U.S. Aeroteam, when in fact the officers of U.S. Aeroteam and all members of our Tribal Council knew that 80% ownership of U.S. Aeroteam would soon be returned to Suhas Kakde and his partners. John Busch also submitted statements saying that U.S. Aeroteam had a facility in Oregon and that they were considering moving their Ohio business to Oregon, trying to secure financial incentives from Ohio to keep their business there. Our tribal council knows U.S. Aeroteam has never had a facility in Oregon and says there were never any plans to move the Ohio business here. So how can we explain these false statements presented to Ohio by U.S. Aeroteam on behalf of our tribe? Clearly tribal council was asleep at the wheel again, and was failing to do due diligence as they failed to do with River Reclamation Group. I further informed tribal members that one year earlier, in 2006, the Tribal Council had quietly made Phil Rilatos, one of their own members, the President of Siletz Aeroteam. Rilatos was paid over $30,000 a year while managing one employee half way across the country. Phil had been drawing this salary for over a year but Tribal Council had never seen fit to reveal this to tribal members.

For this I was silenced at the by General Council Meeting via a motion that Chairman Dee Pigsley ramrodded through in 20 seconds without allowing for any discussion on the motion. That was 15 months ago and the Tribal Council has still shown no interest in finding out why false statements were made to the State of Ohio on our behalf. We've seen that Siletz Aeroteam was never anything more than a pie-in-the-sky plan sold to the Tribal Council by our U.S. Aeroteam partners Suhas Kakde and Jeff Maag. Siletz Aeroteam is dissolved. There was never any reason to think our Tribal Council was competent to launch and run an aerospace company.

From the very day I was silenced in August 2007 General Council, my letters submitted to Siletz News have been regularly rejected or heavily censored by the authority of the editor Brenda Bremner, who, of course, is also our General Manager and the niece of Chairman Dee Pigsley. My letters have often been rejected without comment, in those cases I only find out when the paper arrives and my letter isn't there. I have sought clarification for over a year on why my letters are rejected and only once did I get the editors to indicate what specifically they felt was unacceptable in a letter I submitted to them early this year.. Here is the largest passage that they was deemed unacceptable for the paper:

“The Editor-in-Chief of the Siletz News is Brenda Bremner.  Brenda, as the General Manager of the Tribe, is an appointee of the Tribal Council and she is also the niece of the Tribal Council Chairman.  There are major conflict of interest problems with this arrangement.   “

I was told this passage violates the policy which says letters may not contain “profane language, libelous statements, personal attacks, or unsubstantiated statements”. No one would ever tell me how that passage I wrote violates the policy. This is censorship of a critic of tribal government, plain and simple. Tribal members need a newspaper where criticism of tribal government can be freely expressed, but we don't have one. I showed this and other examples of censorship to every member of tribal Council and none have shown the slightest interest.

Silencing tribal members in our newspaper is bad enough, but now there is a plan in motion to muzzle our candidates for tribal office. In the October issue of Siletz News you will find an announcement from Election Board Vice Chairman Kurtis Barker which announces that he will now be approving all candidates statements and they will be applying the editorial rules of Siletz News, which apparently means there is an excellent chance that my candidates statement will not be accepted. They even intend to limit candidates' statements to 450 words for the first time in our history.

I called our Election Board Chairman Tracey Worman and asked who had decided that the election board would now have authority over candidates statements. She said, “That was brought forward to council mainly because they were afraid that instead of people telling us what their qualifications were, and their stance on different platforms, that they were gonna bash other people."

Election Board Vice Chairman Kurtis Barker who was even more blunt about the new policy on candidates statements. He told me, “We want articles that state why you want to be on Tribal Council, not like an attack mode where you can blame the Tribal Council for what's going on.“

The new policy is clearly intended to prevent candidates from criticizing Tribal Council.

As I tried to learn the source of this new policy from Election Board Chairman Tracey Worman, I was shocked to hear her say that General Manager Brenda Bremner oversees the Election board. She confirmed this several times in no uncertain terms. She told me that if the Election Board had an issue with a candidate's statement they would first contact the candidate to try to clear up any problems, then they would consult Brenda Bremner and then the Tribal Council if necessary. I asked another question about Election Board policy and the Election Board Chairman told me she would have to ask Brenda Bremner, and that Brenda was away for a few days.

Here's a big problem - under our laws Brenda Bremner has no legitimate authority whatsoever over Election Board policies and decisions. Our Election Board is supposed to be an independent body, which, by law, only reports to the Tribal Council. It is utterly inappropriate for Brenda Bremner to be supervising our Election Board. How did we arrive at a point where our Election Board Chairman, Tracey Worman believes that Brenda Bremner oversees the Election Board?

As I went through the minutes of the Tribal Council meetings from the past few years, trying to discover how our new election policies came about, I saw that Brenda Bremner often reported to the Tribal Council on Election Board recommendations and decisions – she spoke for the election board. No wonder they think she's their boss!

One of the few occasions where Election Board Chairman Tracey Worman and Vice-Chairman Kurtis Barker met with the tribal Council to discuss proposed changes to election policy was in April 2008. Surprisingly this discussion took place entirely in secret executive session.. Election Board Chairman Worman told me that Brenda Bremner was also present in this session, though the minutes failed to record this. The session lasted over 90 minutes. I can't imagine any legitimate reason why the tribal Council and the Election Board should discuss election policy in secret for 90 minutes. Nor can I think of any legitimate reason why the General Manager should be present for 90 minutes of secret Election Board discussions.

I found another shocker. At the General Council Meeting in Feburary 2007, on election day, Monte Kentta asked the Tribal Council about a campaign letter sent out by an Election Board member. Chairman Dee Pigsley said the person hadn't broken any rules but had been removed because of the appearance of an ethical problem. I had seen this exchange long ago on one of our DVDs and had not thought much about it. Now I was inclined to dig deeper and I discovered that Chairman Dee Pigsley's account of the matter was extremely self-serving. In fact it was a cover-up.

What Chairman Pigsley should have told tribal members, even before the election, was that the Election Board member who had been removed was none other than the Election Board Chairman, Tina Retasket and that she was removed because she had campaigned on behalf of Dee Pigsley and Vice-Chairman Bud Lane. During the very election she was supposed to be administering fairly, Election Board Chairman Tina Retasket, who was also Assistant General Manager at the time, sent out letters endorsing Dee Pigsley and Bud Lane in the Election. The letters were signed by Tribal Council member Robert Kentta, his mother JoAnn Miller (a recent Tribal Council member), Bud Lane's father, and Rose Bremner (the sister of Chairman Pigsley and the mother of Tina's boss, General Manager Brenda Bremner). You can see a photocopy of the letter on Siletz.Net.

All of these people should have known better than to sign this campaign letter by the Election Board Chairman, but Robert Kentta's involvement is the most troubling because he was a sitting member of the tribal Council that put Tina Retasket on the Election Board.

Every member of the Tribal Council knew this had happened; they knew weeks before the election. They may think that this was not a serious matter. But that was not for them to decide, that was for voters to decide. Every Tribal Council member had a responsibility to investigate the incident and to disclose the facts of this case to the voters. But they don't care much about what the members of this tribe deserve to know, they're mostly concerned about what they can get away with. Chairman Pigsley will tell you that it's really no big deal that the Election Board Chairman was campaigning for Dee and her nephew, Bud Lane, that it's really no big deal that Robert Kentta signed that campaign letter. But what's indisputable is that she didn't give voters the chance to decide for themselves just how big a deal this was, because she didn't give voters the facts.. And we can't let any Tribal Council members off the hook on this one, they all let the tribe down.

Astonishingly, the minutes of the tribal council eight months later, in October 2007 show Brenda Bremner telling Tribal Council that Tina Retasket was back on the Election Board.

You can't make this stuff up.

In her whitewash of this affair Chairman Dee Pigsley said that working on the Election Board is a thankless job. I'm not so sure. Through the Freedom of Information Act I got a copy of a grant application submitted by the tribe which shows that the salary of our Assistant General Manager was $56,062 in 2006 and then jumped to over $96,948 by 2008. Tina Retasket was Assistant General Manager during those years. (Copies available upon request.)

I've told you how my letters to the paper started getting rejected after I criticized the tribal government. I live out-of-area so that's the worst that's happened to me so far. I know it can be a lot worse for people who live here when they criticize the tribal council. I've heard from many tribal members that they cannot afford to come forward with criticism for fear of retaliation. And they have good reason to be afraid.

Lisa Brown has been an outspoken critic of tribal government for years. Earlier this year she was in the Culture Office and asked if she could get some copies made of a petition aimed at making it easier for tribal members to register to vote. A tribal employee made ten copies of the petition for Lisa. Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Bud Lane came in and expressed displeasure that Lisa was getting copies for such a purpose and said he would report her. Lisa offered to pay for the copies if there was a problem, but this did not satisfy him. Lisa reported this little altercation on Siletz.Net the next day. Weeks later Lisa's boss called her in and handed her a reprimand charging her with theft for using the copier in the Culture department. This charge was obviously initiated by Vice-Chairman Bud Lane and it is a brazen example of harassment of a political opponent. You can read the reprimand at www.Siletz.Net. After ridiculously charging Lisa with theft for asking for copies, it says that Lisa would have 30 days to improve her behavior at which time she would meet with her supervisor for review. This happened on May 2nd and the General Council Meeting was the next day. Lisa brought the matter to the attention of the Tribal Council. She was fired upon returning to work the next week – fired for requesting copies in Bud Lane's department. On Friday she was given 30 days to shape up, but after speaking of this at the General Council meeting on Saturday she was immediately terminated. The message is clear - tribal employees cannot criticize tribal government if the want to keep their jobs.

Tribal Voters need to clean house. I urge you to vote for Lisa Brown and against the incumbent tribal Council members Frank Simmons, Jessie Davis, and Reggie Butler. They are not representing you as you deserve.

Finally I want to point out that Chairman Dee Pigsley just introduced Kurtis Barker as a member of our Election Board. In fact, his term has expired and he is not on the Election Board at this time. Kurtis Barker just said that the election ordinance gives the General Manager the power to appoint him. In fact, the election ordinance grants no such power.